Ethical issues when teledermatology employs tape-stripping molecular diagnostics.
Iurillo AM, Zhou AE, Sloan B, Kerr PE, Grant-Kels JM
Clinics in DermatologyIn the feed 23 Sep 2026, published online 23 Sep 2026, issue 2026 Sep 23, added to PubMed 23 Sep 2026
Topics: Practice, education & research
Abstract
Teledermatology has narrowed geographic gaps in dermatologic care, but pigmented lesions are difficult to evaluate remotely. Mailed adhesive tape-stripping kits offer a potential noninvasive molecular adjunct, but their promised benefits (including fewer in-person visits, biopsies, and costs) remain largely unproven in practice. Herein we discuss the ethical pros and cons of tape-stripping in this setting and compare it with alternative investments such as primary care dermoscopy training and teledermoscopy. There remain unresolved concerns regarding tape-stripping cost, evidence of actual practice change, commercial oversight, data governance, and confidentiality in home specimen collection.
Abstract from PubMed
PMID 42777892 · DOI 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2026.09.023