The Daily Papule

Lasers Surg MedSystematic review

The Use of Blue Light as an Antimicrobial Treatment Against Staphylococcus aureus: A Systematic Review.

Idrogo-Lam A, Owusu-Ansah K, Cotter E, Cotter L

Lasers in Surgery and MedicineIn the feed 15 Jul 2026, published online 15 Jul 2026, issue 2026 Nov, added to PubMed 15 Jul 2026

Topics: Infections & infestationsPhotodermatology & sun protection

Abstract

BACKGROUNDStaphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of skin, wound, and device-related infections. Blue light (405-470 nm), shows promise for treating this organism. However, the translatability, dosing parameters, safety, and effectiveness remain unclear, and no systematic review currently exists.

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of blue light therapy against S. aureus across experimental models.

METHODSAll relevant in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials. gov. Studies evaluating blue light without exogenous photosensitizers reporting bacterial or clinical outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE. This study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251089518).

RESULTSA total of 33 articles met inclusion criteria: 20 planktonic models, 6 biofilm models, and 17 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) specific outcomes. The predominant wavelength tested was 405 nm (87.9%). Blue light reduced bacterial burden across models, though results varied by dose and experimental conditions. Additionally, 57.6% of studies did not report statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONSBlue light demonstrates antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, including MRSA, but heterogeneity in study design and limited in vivo data restrict clinical translation. We propose a standardized set of 8 reported parameters for future blue light studies.

Abstract from PubMed

PMID 42454661 · DOI 10.1002/lsm.70172

Comments