The Daily Papule

Derm SurgObservational study

Curettage Versus Topical Treatment for Positive Superficial Margins After Mohs Surgery

A Comparative Analysis of Tumor Recurrence.

Khouri A, Jensen N, Agarwal T, Beck E, Millican E, Tristani-Firouzi P

Dermatologic SurgeryIn the feed 31 Jul 2026, published online 3 Aug 2026, issue 2026 Aug 03, added to PubMed 31 Jul 2026

Topics: Skin cancer & tumorsBasal & squamous cell carcinomaTopical treatmentsSurgery & Mohs

Abstract

BACKGROUNDPositive margins of squamous cell carcinoma in situ or superficial basal cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) occur in a small but clinically significant proportion of cases, with multiple management options available.

OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) across different treatment modalities for positive margins after MMS to inform clinical decision making.

METHODSThis was a retrospective cohort study of 422 patients with positive margins after MMS from 2012 to 2022. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, immunosuppression, tumor characteristics, and anatomic location.

RESULTSAmong 388 patients in the primary analysis (306 curettage, 82 topical treatment), 3-year RFS was 92.6% (95% CI: 89.4%-95.9%) for curettage versus 82.7% (95% CI: 73.1%-93.6%) for topical treatment (p=.021). Topical treatment was independently associated with increased recurrence risk (adjusted hazard ratio 2.73, p=.021) after controlling for risk factors. Immunosuppression was the only other significant predictor of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio 3.04, p = .036).

CONCLUSIONCurettage demonstrated superior 3-year RFS compared with topical treatment for positive margins after MMS, with an absolute difference of 9.9%. These findings support curettage as the preferred initial management approach for positive margins after MMS when clinically feasible.

Abstract from PubMed

PMID 42536405 · DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000005298

Comments